No-arbitrage equality
The right side is the domestic-currency return from converting into foreign currency, investing abroad, and locking the future conversion with a forward contract.
Covered interest arbitrage decision map
This site turns the covered interest arbitrage formula into an interactive flowchart. Choose a scenario, step through the cash flows, and watch the correct arbitrage path light up from borrowing to forward cover.
The flow uses the same convention as the formula page: \(S_{f/d}\) and \(F_{f/d}\) mean foreign currency per domestic currency.
The flowchart is just a visual version of covered interest parity. If the covered foreign path and the domestic path do not end at the same value, borrow the cheaper path and invest in the richer path.
The right side is the domestic-currency return from converting into foreign currency, investing abroad, and locking the future conversion with a forward contract.
Compare this fair forward with the market forward. \(F_{mkt}
CFA questions usually hide the answer in quote direction, bid/ask rates, or timing. The flowchart keeps the core decision separate before you add those complications.
Borrow domestic, buy foreign spot, invest foreign, and buy domestic forward. This locks in enough domestic currency to repay the domestic loan and keep a spread.
The domestic money-market return equals the covered foreign return. Different interest rates alone do not prove arbitrage.
Borrow foreign, buy domestic spot, invest domestic, and sell domestic forward. The overpriced forward provides the excess foreign currency.
Use these short questions to test whether the direction of the arrows is clear. The point is speed: compute parity, compare, then name the flow.
\(S_{USD/EUR}=1.1000\), \(i_{USD}=5\%\), \(i_{EUR}=3\%\), and \(F_{mkt}=1.1100\). What is the trade?
If the market forward is above the parity forward, which flowchart side should light up?
What does the word "covered" mean in covered interest arbitrage?
In bid/ask problems, which rates should a trader use?